NEWS
DATA
LINK
SERVICES
LOGIN / REGISTER
NEWS
DATA
LINK
SERVICES
maritime Executive
About the Publisher
-----
Contact Information
Email Address
-----
Company Phone
-----
Address
-----
Socials
Facebook
-----
Instagram
-----
LinkedIn
-----
Filters
By Country
Apply Filters
Reset Filters
93
articles found
View by
maritime Executive
False Flag Shadow Tanker Detained In Venezuela
The Maritime Authority in Guyana is confirming media reports that a tanker being detained in Venezuela was flying a false flag and not legitimately linked to Guyana. The Venezuelan military authorities reportedly detained the vessel over the weekend for sailing in the country’s waters without permission. According to the Venezuelan newspaper Ultimas Noticias, the incident occurred on January 12 at the port of Guamache on Margarita Island, which sits about 25 miles off the coast of Venezuela. The authorities inspected the vessel and ordered the detention claiming the vessel was “not authorized to navigate” in Venezuela. News reports published pictures of the vessel identified as Four Plus, a 45,000 dwt product tanker built in 2000. The reports said the ship has a crew of Chinese nationals aboard. Venezuela retiene el buque tanquero Four Plus con bandera guyanesa tras violar la soberanía del país via @venprensa https://t.co/eq5HQD2QKy The Equasis database reports the vessel is operated by Shanghai Xuanrun Shipping Co. of Shanghai and has been in Chinese hands since 2018. It changed names in 2024 with its class listed as unknown and its last known flag as Hong Kong in 2018. Its last inspection was in China in early 2024 when safety issues with fire prevention and structural issues with railings and walkways were flagged. The vessel’s AIS signal shows it departing Ningbo, China on November 22 and arriving at the Point Lisas Anchorage in Trinidad & Tobago on January 5. That is the last position shown on its AIS signal. Guyana’s Maritime Authority issued a statement on January 13 reporting, “The vessel is not registered in Guyana, so it is not authorized to fly the Guyana flag or claim Guyanese nationality. MARAD wishes to remind stakeholders and the public that it operates a closed Ships’ Registry, and does not offer a flag of convenience.” It is the second time in recent weeks Guyana has reported false flag operations highlighting that it only offers registry for vessels owned by citizens, residents, and the Caribbean Community states. The United States sanctioned five tankers claiming registry in Guyana that the U.S. authorities said were operated by a company in Syria with ties to Iran and Venezuela. Guyana reported none of the vessels were legally flagged in the country. The Government of Guyana three years ago broke ties with a company calling itself International Maritime Safety Agency of Guyana. At the time Guyana accused the company of “fraudulent representations and illicit conduct.” The government reports it has been working with Interpol and brought to the attention of the International Maritime Organization the criminal activities saying it is one of several countries that have been victimized by false flag operations. The authorities in Venezuela have not provided additional details other than confirming an investigation was underway into the tanker.
port-and-ship
Jan 15, 2025
maritime Executive
Black Sea Containerized Freight Rises, Led By Rebound In Ukraine
The Black Sea container terminals of Bulgaria, Romania and Ukraine handled 979,000 TEU in the first nine months of 2024, including empty containers and transshipment. This is an increase of 14 percent compared to the same period last year, and the jump reflects the revival of containerized trade to and from Ukrainian ports. (This review considers laden container trade by sea only, since waterborne container traffic in Ukraine is about 25 percent of the total.) Laden container turnover increased in all these countries, and the highest growth was achieved by Ukraine (79 percent). During this period, 53 percent of full containers handled were imported, with 47 percent of the volume being exported. It is estimated that the share of laden containers was 77 percent and empty containers made up 22 percent. Import volumes to the aforementioned countries increased by 19 percent compared to 2023. The highest import volume increase was shown by Ukraine – 116 percent, a record rate of growth. In Romania there was an increase of 23 percent, while in Bulgaria there was a decrease of about three percent. Exports from these countries increased by nearly 10 percent, mainly because of Ukrainian and Bulgarian export volume growth of 64 percent and 14 percent (respectively). There was a slight increase in laden export volume in Romania. Thus, the percentage of laden volume handled by each country in the first nine months of 2024 was distributed as follows: Romania – 70 percent, Bulgaria – 22 percent, Ukraine – eight percent. It is worth noting that significant volume growth in Ukraine was driven by the restoration of direct container feeder connections. In the beginning of 2024, a local forwarding company deployed a few vessels transshipping containers from Constanta to Chornomorsk port. Later on, MSC and Maersk deployed their own vessels from Tekirdag and Port Said, respectively. Historically, Maersk, MSC and CMA CGM were leading carriers in the Black Sea region, and their total share of the market was more than 60 percent in recent years. As for the other countries of the Black Sea, laden container turnover in Novorossiysk increased by seven percent to 570,000 TEU. About 40 percent of this volume was transported by MSC and Turkish carriers in the Black Sea, while the other 60 percent were transported by local carriers in Russia. Georgia's total volume in 9m 2023 reached 518,000 TEU, while our estimation is about 15 percent lower for 9m 2024, when the total volume is expected to reach about 440,000 TEU. The forecast of container turnover growth in the Black Sea region for 2024-2025 shows that growth will amount to 5-7 percent and will exceed 3 million TEU in 2025. The major driver of that growth will be further restoration and expansion of direct container connection to Ukrainian ports. Vassiliy Vesselovski is the CEO of Ukrainian shipping intelligence firm Informall BG. Daniil Melnychenko is a Data Analyst with the firm, and Alexander Khromov is a Project Manager.
port-and-ship
Jan 14, 2025
maritime Executive
Wellard Sells Last Ship, Ends Business With Live Export Under Pressure
Once described as Australia’s largest live export business, Wellard announced the sale of its final ship as it shuts down shipping operations. The move comes as live export continues to be under pressure and is scheduled to become illegal in Australia and elsewhere. Wellard traces its origins to Italy and the first shipment of livestock in 1950. Its first shipment from Australia took place in 1979 and the following year it was incorporated as Wellard. In an industry known for old, dilapidated vessels, the company turned to purpose-built newbuilds including Ocean Drover (13,500 dwt) which when built in 2002 was the largest purpose-built livestock carrier. The company highlighted its capability of transporting 75,000 sheep or 20,000 cattle along with advanced ventilation, feed, and water systems. The vessel which is registered in Singapore carried its one-millionth head of cattle in October 2015, and by late June 2022, marked its 200th journey. The company reported the vessel had transported nearly 1.8 million cattle and more than 5 million sheep, traveling over two million nautical miles as it turned 20 years old. Pressure on the industry grew and in recent years there has been an increased focus from animal rights activists which documented poor conditions in the industry. After years of pressure, New Zealand banned live export in 2023 followed by moves in Great Britain. Australia has limited the trade and is scheduled to end the export of sheep in 2028. Wellard which had recently had a fleet of five vessels began selling capacity in 2017. Down from five ships, they reported the sale in 2024 of the Ocean Ute (7,300 dwt) leaving it with a single ship, Ocean Drover. The business in 2020 had reduced operations and transitioned to chartering and logistics working with importers and exports. In September 2024, Wellard’s board reported it was commencing a strategic review. They said they would explore the long-term future of the company as well as the future and future commercial environment. The Ocean Drover was cited as its flagship and the best in terms of profitability and capacity. The ship was operating between South America and Turkey with the company reporting it has charter commitments till June 2025. Wellard agreed to sell the Ocean Drover for $50 million to Meteors Shipping, a Marshall Islands company controlled by Göktaslar Et-Et Ürünleri Yan Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, a significant Turkish agribusiness with which Wellard has conducted business for some time. As the last asset of the company, the sale will require the approval of Wellard shareholders and is expected to be completed in July 2025. The company plans to distribute the proceeds to shareholders. The board said it was exploring the future and was also considering delisting the company from the ASX (Australia Securities Exchange). They highlight the sale price of the vessel is substantially above the current net book value. Once having highlighted the growing international demand for beef, sheep meat, and dairy products, Wellard is bringing an end to its 46-year involvement in the global live export industry.
port-and-ship
Jan 14, 2025
maritime Executive
Issue Of Seafarer Criminalization Highlighted In New Effort By Intermanager
InterManager is concerned by the increasingly harsh treatment of ships’ crew in some parts of the world. The trade association for the ship management sector is starting an effort to collect data and highlight to the IMO and other industry stakeholders the harsh treatment of seafarers including the number of cases where seafarers are being “criminalized” for events involving their ships. “There is a concern within the shipping industry that seafarers are being unfairly detained when authorities find something wrong with their ship, often when drugs are found onboard but also in other circumstances. Most frequently senior officers are detained, although the whole crew can be, and held without charge for long periods of time and often without any proper legal representation or assistance,” said Captain Kuba Szymanski, Secretary General of InterManager. The initial data compiled by InterManager identified 118 cases of criminalization but it suspects there are many more. The limited initial data it reports shows that the number of cases has increased, peaking in 2023 at 23 cases, with a further 17 in 2024. They cite as an example, Captain Andrzej Lasota, a Polish citizen, who spent two years in jail in Mexico without a trial. He was charged with “negligence in failing to be aware that the ship he commanded may have been carrying prohibitive substances” after 240kgs of cocaine was found buried in his ship’s coal cargo. The drugs were discovered by a ship’s officer and reported by the master to the authorities after he had stopped cargo work. The whole crew was arrested by armed military forces and held for three months, while Captain Lasota was incarcerated for longer, facing a possible 20 years for drug trafficking. He was eventually released from a harrowing jail term of 592 days without charge, in poor health, and having lost over 50 pounds in weight. There are other similar examples of crews being held in Europe after the discovery of drugs aboard their vessels. Turkey sentenced a captain and the vessel’s first mate to long jail time when cocaine was found on their ship. India held the crew of a Vietnamese cargo ship for a year without charges when cocaine was seized from the ship during a port call. It led to one engineer jumping overboard in an apparent suicide attempt and after 12 months the crew went on strike to win its release. “No one deserves to be treated like that while just going about their daily work,” said Capt Szymanski. “This is an issue which needs to be addressed at the highest levels, and we are pleased to see the IMO taking seafarers’ concerns seriously on this matter.” The association reports that senior officers are most at risk of criminalization. Statistics collected so far it says reveal that in 63 percent of cases, the ship’s master was the one imprisoned. Tanker crews represent the most frequent vessel type on which arrests occurred (29 percent), followed by bulk carriers (19 percent), and general cargo vessels (14 percent). Criminalization occurs across the globe says InterManager. Cases are most frequent in Asia, with a significant number occurring in both Europe and the Americas. InterManager plans to collate statistics on criminalization incidents and is asking others to submit information. It plans to share the data with the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and other shipping industry stakeholders.
port-and-ship
Jan 14, 2025
maritime Executive
Dali Completes Repairs 10 Months After Hitting Baltimore Bridge
The containership Dali which became notorious for its allision destroying Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge has completed repairs and is preparing to return to service. The ship was operating under charter to Maersk at the time of the incident and according to the shipping line’s online scheduler, she returns to service on January 17. Dali spent the past two months at China’s Fujian Hudong Shipyard arriving there on November 13 after a nearly two-month voyage from Norfolk in the U.S. where she had unloaded after the salvage was completed. The shipyard highlights the work was completed 10 days ahead of the initial schedule with the Dali heading out on sea trials on January 12. The 10-year-old containership (116,851 dwt) registered in Singapore traveled empty to China after offloading its containers in Virginia and undergoing initial repairs. Port officials in China emphasized the close coordination required to bring the vessel into port due to the extent of the damage. The yard highlights the extensive damage to the vessel required the development of a comprehensive repair strategy and coordination between multiple departments. The repairs to the bow and forward section included the structural damage, the machinery, and anchors, as well as the thrusters. Work was also performed on the number one cargo hold and the yard reports overhauling the hydraulic and electrical control systems. It is unclear how the work addressed the numerous electrical system issues and make-shift repairs identified by investigators and the subject for the civil damage claims in Maryland’s courts. Maersk’s online schedule shows the vessel arriving in Shanghai on January 17 and then making port calls in Ningbo and Gwangyang before proceeding to South Korea. She will cross the Pacific bound for Panama, Colombia, and Peru where she will arrive in late February. Maryland’s court schedule called for the civil case to begin taking witness statements and assembling evidence in 2025. The goal was to wind down all the preparations by early 2026 and move to pre-trial ahead of the first of two court cases. The first phase scheduled for June 2026 is to consider the issue of limited liability and then in the second phase assign value to the multitude of claims.
port-and-ship
Jan 14, 2025
maritime Executive
China Wins Release Of Fishing Boat Held Off Somalia
The Chinese Embassy in Somalia announced that the fishing vessel seized by pirates in November has been released. They said the crew was unharmed and the vessel was moving into “safe waters.” The incident involving the fishing boat was reported at the beginning of December by EUNAVFOR Atalanta, the EU mission to monitor security off the Horn of Africa. The report said Atalanta had been notified and investigated but they classified it an armed robbery because the vessel remained in territorial waters. In today’s statement, the Chinese Embassy said attempts to sabotage the China-Somalia cooperation are in vain citing the “profound traditional friendship.” Details of the release were not provided with the embassy only speaking of the “unremitting efforts of the Chinese government.” Atalanta had reported it was monitoring the vessel and in contact with the authorities in Somalia and China. In mid-December, reports surfaced that the pirates increased their demand to $10 million for the release of the vessel. This came after reports said the Chinese offered $300,000 and later 1 million dollars for the release of the ship and its crew. Associated Press in Somalia reports today it is unclear if any money was paid. The vessel had been boarded it was revealed in late November. When Atalanta spotted the vessel, it reported “the fishing vessel is under control of the alleged pirates, some of whom are carrying AK-47s and machine guns.” The vessel was taken to the Puntland region which is semi-autonomous of Somalia. The region is known for its support of the piracy activity. Atalanta’s data shows that it has documented reports of 20 attacks in 2024 including ones that were not successful in seizing vessels. They said there were 15 suspicious approaches reported during the year. It however notes that there is an unknown number of unreported/unconfirmed incidents involving dhows and smaller vessels.
port-and-ship
Jan 13, 2025
maritime Executive
Future Development Of Flettner Rotor Propulsion
Wind energy historically provided the basis for vessel propulsion, using sails and sometimes kites. During the 1920s, engineer Anton Flettner developed large cylinders spinning on a vertical axis to redirect a wind stream to produce vessel propulsion. There is scope to combine recent developments in multiple technologies with Flettner cylinders to enhance the performance of wind-assisted and wind-propelled commercial vessels. Introduction Flettner rotors are large cylinders that spin on a vertical axis, redirecting the flow of wind energy to produce a reaction in the form of propulsion on large vessels sailing through windswept regions of ocean, reducing fuel consumption. Flettner Rotor operation might be compared to that of an aerosol can where a small amount of pressure applied to the control button releases a large amount of pressure from storage. A small amount of energy from an electric motor is required to spin the Flettner cylinder, which redirects the flow of wind energy to produce a massive amount of propulsive thrust. There are alternate methods by which to sustain cylinder rotation. Geographic locations Several regions of the world experience reliable and steady winds. Coastal winds occur in many regions after sunrise, with wind blowing inland from sea to land and in the opposite direction after sunset. Both wind directions provide the basis for wind-based vessel propulsion, with predominant wind direction determining the choice of wind-driven propulsion technology. While some wind-powered vessels would need to sail directly into headwinds, other vessels would sail parallel to the wind, while even other vessels could redirect kinetic energy from side-winds to achieve propulsion. Already proven technology can convert energy from tail winds and side winds. Some ship captains had recorded fuel consumption on their vessels on certain voyages, prior to and after installation of Flettner rotors. They reported up to 25% reduction in fuel consumption along sections of the voyage with rotors in operation. Whereas sails of clipper ships delivered up to 3,500-horsepower, groups of deck-mounted rotor sails are estimated to deliver up to and over 10,000-horsepower on voyages that pass through windswept regions of the ocean. Related technologies The concept of “convergence of technologies” combines features of existing and proven technologies with large cylinders that rotate on a vertical axis above the deck of a ship. Cylinder rotation requires a small input of power to redirect a large amount of wind energy that would result in propulsion. The cylinders need to rotate either clockwise or counter clockwise depending on wind direction. Bi-directional mechanical gearboxes are available in the railway industry, with bi-directional electric motors also being readily available. Flywheels along with variable ratio transmissions and multi-speed gearboxes are also readily available. Maritime vessels can carry the weight and accommodate the volume of multiple container size grid-scale batteries that could sustain several days of cylinder rotation aboard commercial vessels. Certain configurations of deck-mounted wind turbines could through gear mechanisms, initiate and sustain cylinder rotation. Waterwheels could likely sustain deck-mounted cylinder rotation after a vessel has reached a suitable sailing speed. During daylight hours, electric energy from solar photo-voltaic panels could energize electric motors that sustain several hours of cylinder rotation. Wind turbines driving cylinders Tilting a self-starting, vertical-axis bladed wind turbine by 90-degrees lets it rotate on a transverse horizontal axis. Installed at low elevation above the deck, it would drive a vertical-axis Flettner rotor through a bi-directional gearbox. A deflector would guide wind energy only to the working section of transverse-axis bladed turbine. Above certain wind speed, bladed small wind turbines of sufficient size and spinning on a horizontal axis would be able to sustain rotation of large non-bladed deck-mounted cylinders, allowing them to redirect a massive amount of wind energy to produce vessel propulsion. An alternative approach could involve low-cost, long-life grid-scale batteries housed inside shipping containers and carried far below deck. Battery-driven electric motors could sustain propeller driven propulsion for short distances, departing from port and sailing into a port. Batteries driving the cylinders via electric motors could sustain vessel propulsion between ports of origin and destination, both located in windswept regions. Future wind-powered vessels could combine batteries, flywheels, water wheels, Flettner rotors, suction sail propulsion along with kite technology on the same vessel, so as to use trade winds and side winds for propulsion. Conclusions Wind energy is presently assisting some piston engine vessels with propulsion. There is also growing interest in developing commercial vessels that sail almost exclusively on wind energy, potentially sailing the routes of clipper ships and schooners of an earlier era in both short-sea and trans-ocean shipping. While a small number of wind-powered passenger cruise ships use deck mounted aeronautical wing type sails and kite-sails for propulsion, future wind-powered cruise ships could feature the combination of Flettner rotors, suction sails, and stacked kite technology to provide propulsion.
port-and-ship
Jan 10, 2025
maritime Executive
Self-Unloader Goes Aground On Delaware River In Philadelphia
The U.S Coast Guard is formulating a plan to safely refloat a Supramax self-unloader that grounded in the Delaware River near Philadelphia on Wednesday evening. The Algoma Verity was northbound from the Port of Philadelphia when it went aground outside the main shipping channel on Wednesday night. The pilot of the 50,000 dwt self-unloader notified the Coast Guard of the incident at 6:30 p.m Wednesday, prompting a response to try and refloat the bulker. A team from Coast Guard Sector Delaware Bay and the vessel’s representatives are on board and formulating a plan to safely move the vessel to a nearby terminal, the Coast Guard said Thursday. So far, no injuries have been reported and there have been no reports of pollution. The cause of the grounding is under investigation. A safety zone has been established around the Verity restricting vessel traffic from the Benjamin Franklin Bridge to Tioga Marine Terminal. According to maritime tracking sites, the vessel grounded about one hour after departing port in Philadelphia. The ship was headed for Fairless Hills, Bucks County with a load of 45,000 tonnes of solar salt (a higher-purity grade than rock salt, made by evaporation). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is also scanning the bottom around the Algoma Verity to identify any hazards and better determine the nature of the grounding. As of Thursday night, the vessel remained grounded in the Delaware River, just off Petty's Island. Built in 2000 and wholly owned by Canadian company Algoma Central Corporation, Algoma Verity is commercially managed by CSL as part of the CSL International Pool. The vessel operates mainly along the coasts of the Americas. CSL is the world’s largest owner and operator of gravity self-unloading vessels. The company currently operates a fleet of 45 self-unloaders ranging from Handysize to Supramax.
port-and-ship
Jan 09, 2025
maritime Executive
To Save The Sounion, Ambrey Combined Salvage With Security And Politics
Maritime security firm Ambrey has released the first detailed recounting of the operation to save the tanker Sounion, which was attacked and burned by Houthi forces last fall. In Ambrey's recounting, it may rank among the most challenging salvage operations since the Costa Concordia or the Deepwater Horizon, with the unique risk of operating next to a hostile armed militia. The Greek-owned tanker Sounion was attacked by Houthi forces three times on August 21, disabling the engine and leaving the ship adrift. After withstanding small arms fire, a possible shoulder-launched grenade, multiple projectiles, and a (thwarted) suicide drone boat attack, the crew of the Sounion asked for help abandoning ship. On August 22, a French frigate carried them to safety. The next day, Houthi fighters boarded the tanker to plant explosive charges on the main deck and in the wheelhouse. The blasts tore multiple holes in the tanks, igniting more than a dozen fires, which continued to burn while the owners and insurers looked for salvage options. ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ????????? SOUNION ?? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???????. pic.twitter.com/nvjHU4SFG2 Ambrey - which had already been engaged to provide security during the voyage - accepted the high-risk job. The Sounion salvage presented unique factors perhaps never seen before in combination, including multiple active cargo fires on a laden supertanker; ongoing risk of attack or hijacking by a well-equipped terrorist force; a high level of political interest and multi-government involvement; and a severe risk of harm to regional food security and economic activity in the event of a spill. Sounion was located just 60 miles off the coast of Yemen, well within range of Houthi drone and missile capabilities, and she was under continued surveillance by Houthi vessels. In addition to the serious security situation, the tanker and her 160,000-tonne cargo of oil were adrift and burning, threatening to leak, sink, or run aground - any of which could result in a spill up to four times the size of the Exxon Valdez. The clock was ticking. Courtesy EUNAVFOR Aspides Ambrey decided that it would not be advisable to carry out a major marine firefighting and salvage operation within reach of Houthi military capabilities, since the group had already attacked the tanker several times. To conduct the salvage, it would be necessary to tow the Sounion while she was still on fire - a task for which there were few precedents or guidelines. The southern Red Sea has limited local salvage and heavy towage assets, so Ambrey moved to mobilize people and equipment to the area as fast as possible. The Greek-owned salvage tug Aigaion Pelagos would be the lead towing vessel, with a second tug to assist as needed. Government involvement at a high level helped smooth the way for transfer of equipment through customs on an expedited basis. The operation began in earnest around September 2, but halted September 3 because the response group "concluded that the conditions were not met to conduct the towing operation," the EUNAVFOR security mission reported at the time. It would be mid-September before the team was assembled, all technical details ironed out, and a European naval escort group mobilized provide security. The tow began September 13, three weeks after the ship began burning. In conversation with Lloyd's List, Ambrey's Joshua Hutchinson explained that the most significant issue with the tow was the political "port of refuge" dilemma. Reducing risk required a safe anchorage, but no coastal state wanted to take the risk of allowing the Sounion nearby. The salvage team needed to tow the vessel north, but Saudi forces did not want to allow the burning tanker near Saudi shores for fear of a spill. It took high-level diplomatic contacts to smooth the disagreement out and secure permission for the transit. Marine firefighting operations at night aboard the Sounion (JMIC) On October 9, after three weeks of firefighting, the blazes were out and the holes in the cargo tanks had temporary patches installed. Towing resumed, and at Suez, the process of a slow and careful STS transfer began to remove her oil. The lightering operation ended at last on December 2, and the project began to come to an end - unlike Houthi attacks, which continue over the Red Sea.
port-and-ship
Jan 09, 2025
maritime Executive
China And Cosco Lash Out Over U.S. Listing Of Military-Related Companies
The Chinese government and COSCO Shipping responded to the U.S. Department of Defense’s inclusion of the company among the 134 organizations listed for ties to the military. The Chinese government continued to blame anti-China sentiments in the U.S. while calling for fair treatment for its companies while COSCO said it would “engage with U.S. authorities to clarify the matter.” The U.S. Department of Defense was mandated by Congress in 2021 to start compiling and releasing a listing each year of companies it believes are supporting China’s military. The listing of so-called “Chinese military companies” carries no specific penalties, but is used to discourage U.S. businesses from working with these companies. The Pentagon can not do business with companies that are deemed to be supporting the Chinese military. COSCO, which is the world’s largest shipowner, was added to the listing that was released yesterday, January 7. It joins other well-known Chinese companies including China State Shipbuilding Corporation as well as the manufacturer of shipping containers. COSCO North America issued a mostly boilerplate statement about consistently adhering to local laws and regulations and maintaining strict compliance in all international operations. In the statement, it said none of its companies (COSCO Shipping, the North American division, and COSCO Shipping Finance which were each listed) are Chinese military companies. A spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce when asked said they had “noted” the listing while calling on the U.S. to respect facts and stop “discriminatory treatment to Chinese companies.” He said, “China is strongly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes,” the listing of the companies. The Ministry of Commerce asserted that the U.S. “continued to generalize the concept of national security,” and “groundlessly accused China of its ‘military-civilian integration’ strategy. China it said, will closely follow relevant developments and take all necessary measures to resolutely defend the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies.
port-and-ship
Jan 08, 2025
maritime Executive
Norway Launches Second Phase Of Nuclear Propulsion In Shipping Study
Norway’s NuProShip (Nuclear Propulsion in Shipping) project is transitioning into its second stage as of January 2025 after having completed initial studies into Generation IV reactors. The project which launched in 2023 has the ultimate purpose to develop a commercially viable zero-emission technology for deep-sea ships. The Research Council of Norway awarded nearly $1 million (NOK 10 mission) in support of the project which has also drawn support from some of the leading companies in the shipping industry. DNV is among the partners as is Knutsen Tankers, the Norwegian Maritime Administration, and Spanish nuclear consultancy IDOM. Shipbuilder VARD reports it is joining the second stage of the project, which is currently scheduled to run through the end of 2025. The project started with a focus on approved designs with a power of 25 to 55 MW. In the first phase, it was studying the feasibility of different nuclear reactor concepts within the Generation IV domain. VARD reports there was an extensive assessment of concepts from 99 companies before three reactor types were selected for future study. Two of the concepts use TRISO fuel participles which are billed as one of the most resilient nuclear fuel types available today. It would be used with a Fluoride high-temperature molten salt reactor which is reported to be a robust design that would provide efficient operation. A second is a helium-cooled gas reactor. The third concept is smaller variants of the lead-cooled reactor concept using uranium oxide as a fuel. The shipping industry has shown increasing interest in the concept of nuclear-powered propulsion returning to concepts first explored nearly 70 years ago. The United States was successful in building a demonstration prototype passenger-cargo ship, the NS Savannah, but the nascent stage of the technology, concerns over the dangers of nuclear reactors, and the navy’s focus on nuclear propulsion limited the commercial applications. Russia is the primary user of nuclear propulsion for its icebreakers. The next phase of the NuProShip project will be expanded to also include insurance companies to further explore the viability of nuclear technology in the shipping industry. The concepts defined in the first phase will be further analyzed during the second phase as they also study feasibility, safety, costs, waste, and other factors. VARD reports its primary role involves the integration of the reactor concepts into various vessel types. It will be assessing the technical challenges to enable the future commercial use of nuclear-powered ships. The third phase of the project calls for developing and testing a prototype. The conclusion will assemble all the insights and estimate the economic and environmental effects. It will outline the risks and future development needs to proceed with the concept of nuclear-powered merchant ships.
port-and-ship
Jan 07, 2025
maritime Executive
China’S Cosco Shipping Listed By U.S. For Links To Chinese Military
The U.S. Department of Defense published its annual listing of companies linked to China’s military adding shipping giant COSCO Shipping and two of its subsidiaries, as well as other companies including the Chinese oil company Cnooc, to the designation. The associations between Chinese companies and the military have long been reported but this step formalizes the designation in an effort to discourage U.S. involvement with the companies on the list. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 included the requirement for the annual listing. Written by Congress, the subsection requires the Secretary of Defense to identify and publish a list of “Chinese military companies” annually. DoD published today, January 7, the notice of the annual listing in the Federal Register. The Pentagon reviews the companies and sets the criteria for what entities qualify as “Chinese military companies.” The U.S. government is barred from doing business with those companies and the publication is meant to expose the companies. Congress’s goal was to discourage private companies from working with companies on the list. It is not the first time COSCO, which calls itself the world’s largest shipowner, has come under scrutiny by the U.S. government. The first Trump administration in 2019 briefly sanctioned COSCO’s tanker operator for transporting Iranian oil. The sanctions however were removed the following year. In addition to COSCO Shipping, the new listing includes COSCO Shipping (North America) and COSCO Shipping Finance Co. Cnooc was also included on the list and joins others including China State Shipbuilding Corporation which had already been cited. Among the total 134 companies listed are also China International Marine Corporation, the manufacturer of shipping containers, and China Shipbuilding Trading Co., a CSSC subsidiary used to promote Chinese shipbuilding globally. CATL, the leading battery manufacturer is also on the list. It has long been asserted that China uses the commercial industry to support its military. COSCO transports military goods and CSSC is the builder of vessels of China’s Navy. Among its projects are China’s new aircraft carrier and it recently launched the world’s largest amphibious assault ship. Increasingly elements of Chinese industry have been coming under scrutiny. In March 2024, five U.S. unions formed an alliance filing a trade complaint to challenge China’s shipbuilding industry. The U.S. Senate also held subcommittee hearings on China’s shipbuilding industry. The pressure for action against the shipbuilding sector continues to grow as China expands its dominance in the global orderbook for new ships. A bipartisan group of U.S. Senators and members of the House of Representatives in December 2024 introduced the SHIPS for America Act calling it the first comprehensive effort to revitalize the U.S. merchant marine. Key elements focus on China and Chinese shipping. In addition to Trump’s proposed tariffs on Chinese goods, the act would create a requirement to transport 10 percent of Chinese goods on American ships and add tariffs on Chinese shipping. Today’s action by the Department of Defense, however, is seen largely as symbolic. It solidifies the designation of the association between Chinese industry and the military. Analysts have long said those ties existed in all parts of Chinese industry.
port-and-ship
Jan 07, 2025