NEWS
DATA
LINK
SERVICES
LOGIN / REGISTER
NEWS
DATA
LINK
SERVICES
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Founded on
-----
Founded at
-----
News Coverage
POWERPLANT
Advertise your business here! 🚀
Contact us now and get more customers.
Advertise With Us
10
UDG Publishers' Articles
Filter by
Country
Status
Year
View by
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Ira Tax Credit Repeal Would Drive Up Electricity Prices, System Costs: Reports
Electricity demand is expected to increase by 50% over the next decade due to rising demand from data centers, re-shored manufacturing, electrification of industry and increased oil and gas production, ConservAmerica said on Feb. 20. Solar, wind and batteries are the resources best-placed to meet demand in the near term, with solar and wind providing the lowest-cost generation option and batteries “[providing] capacity and quick-start capabilities,” according to the Brattle/ConservAmerica report. “As Congress moves forward, we want to ensure that policymakers have the benefit of real economic data about the impacts of eliminating clean energy credits. Our elected officials should make decisions based on facts, not politically charged emotions,” ConservAmerica President Jeff Kupfer said in a statement. New thermal generation projects have a longer road to commissioning, Brattle said. Supply chain bottlenecks, rising turbine prices, long permitting processes and “transmission queues and delays” mean unplanned gas-fired generation projects likely won’t come online before 2030, while new nuclear capacity faces “[a] very long lead time,” the report said. Following full repeal of the IRA’s technology-neutral investment and production tax-credits, wind and solar deployments would fall about 50% through 2035, “along with some decrease in storage,” according to the report. With limited new gas-fired generation expected to come online before the early 2030s, a “shortfall of supply to meet power need” could develop, potentially holding back industrial growth, Brattle and ConservAmerica said. Though the Trump administration has pledged federal policy support for gas, nuclear and other firm resources, procurement challenges and worsening project economics led Engie, a French multinational utility, to withdraw a proposed 930-MW gas plant from consideration for low-interest financing from the $5 billion Texas Energy Fund. Texas voters approved the program in 2023 to encourage deployment or expansion of dispatchable resources following widespread power-system failures two years prior during Winter Storm Uri. Meanwhile, Texas added about 5 GW of battery capacity between the summers of 2023 and 2024, improving the grid’s ability to meet evening peak demand while softening wholesale price spikes, according to analyses by the American Clean Power Association and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. If Congress fully repeals the investment and production tax credits, the U.S. average delivered electricity price would increase nearly 10% by 2029, according to the NERA/CEBA report. At the state level, the report projects the sharpest increases — up to 21.1% for residential customers and 30.6% for C&I customers — in Midwestern and Western states. By 2035, repeal would cause a 14% increase in total power generation system costs, with rate impacts disproportionately borne by lower- and middle-income customers, Brattle and ConservAmerica said. U.S. residential customers would see an average annual electric bill increase of $83, increasing to as much as $152 in wind-rich central states like Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma and the Dakotas, they said. “The lack of technology-neutral tax incentives has the effect of increasing the electricity prices in both cost-of-service and competitive regions as electricity demand must be met by relatively more expensive generating technologies,” NERA and CEBA said. Repeal would reduce total cumulative wind and solar capacity additions 168 GW by 2029, relative to a no-repeal scenario, according to the NERA/CEBA report. Brattle and ConservAmerica project a milder decline in wind and solar deployment through 2030 — 116 GW — but a sharp combined decrease of 328 GW between 2031 and 2035. They forecast a 12-GW increase in storage deployments through 2030, followed by a decrease of 18 GW from 2031 to 2035.
powerplant
Feb 27, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Pse&G Large Load Pipeline Jumps To 4.7 Gw As Nuclear Offtake Talks Continue: Ceo Larossa
PSEG is “constructively positioned” going into 2025, according to Guggenhoim Securities analysts, led by Shahriar Pourreza. “Among utility peers, we believe [PSEG] offers potential earnings upside from data center commercial agreements, higher PJM regional load growth driving transmission investments, a constructive regulatory environment and no need for equity financing during a time of major equity issuance for the utility sector, driven by incremental growth and balance sheet repair,” the analysts said in a note Tuesday. However, the potential large load growth comes amid uncertainty surrounding the future of the PJM Interconnection’s capacity market. “I don't know if there is a PJM market anymore,” LaRossa said, noting that some states in the grid operator’s footprint are exploring alternative approaches to ensuring they have adequate power supplies. “My concern there is mostly from a reliability standpoint,” LaRossa said. “Are we going to be able in this construct, to attract generation to the PJM region as a whole, and if so, is it going to be in a timely enough fashion?” New Jersey is at a crossroads, according to LaRossa. “We're all trying to figure out the best way to move forward. I don't think there's a clear answer on it.” Customer affordability is also a major issue, according to LaRossa. Driven by the results of PJM’s most recent capacity auction, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities expects electric bills for PSE&G’s residential customers will jump 17.2% on average for the 12-month period starting June 1. The utility, which has about 2.4 million electric customers, makes no money on the default supply of electricity. Pending action at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on rules for colocating load at power plants hasn’t slowed discussions with potential customers, according to LaRossa. “They seem to have understood the urgency in what they said, even though we didn't get complete clarity,” he said. FERC could approve colocation rules for PJM as soon as late June, according to Morgan Stanley analysts. PSEG raised its capital spending plan for 2025 to 2029 to $22.5 billion to $26 billion, up $3.5 billion from its previous plan, LaRossa said. The Newark, New Jersey-based company expects that all of its capital requirements over the next three years will come from internally generated funds and debt financing, PSEG said Tuesday in its annual report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As part of the overall increase, PSE&G increased its five-year capital investment plan about 15% to $21 billion to $24 billion for 2025 through 2029, with a focus on infrastructure modernization, energy efficiency and load growth, the company said. As a result, PSEG said it expects the utility’s rate base will grow at a 6% to 7.5% compound annual rate over the next five years. PSEG’s income fell to $1.8 billion, or $3.54/share, in 2024 from $2.7 billion, or $5.13/share the year earlier, the company said in a press release. Revenue dipped to $10.3 billion in 2024, from $11.2 billion in 2023. Not counting one-time items, PSEG’s operating earnings increased to $1.8 billion last year from $1.7 billion in 2023.
powerplant
Feb 26, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Leveraging Surplus Interconnection Could Unleash 800 Gw Of Energy The Us Needs Today
Cassady Craighill is the technical education director at GridLab. The challenges facing the grid can often feel intimidating and beyond grasp. How much of the load growth is hype and how much is real? How do we ensure the financial burden of updating our grid and leading the world in energy innovation does not disproportionally fall on residential customers? How do operators and utilities prepare for the next cataclysmic flood, fire, or storm? How do we ensure that our 21st energy grid serves everyone across the country amidst a patchwork of different state policies and resources? Those are all big questions that will take years to get exactly right. Luckily, there is an out-of-the-box solution laying on the table today that will get hundreds of energy projects online in no time and will save consumers money. Surplus interconnection, which allows new energy projects to plug into existing interconnection infrastructure at plants with low capacity factors, could nearly double the generation in the United States by 2030 and at a fraction of the cost and time of a traditional interconnection process. Affordable, clean, and abundant power is key to keeping businesses operating in the U.S. This sentiment dominates the rhetoric in Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s first Secretarial order issued this month and his message of “energy addition.” At its core, surplus interconnection is adding energy resources to the grid as quickly and cheaply as possible. In his order, Secretary Wright insists “we must expand energy production and reduce energy costs for American families and businesses.” Leveraging existing interconnection capacity at thermal plants is the fastest way to expand energy production by shaving years off the interconnection timeline, saving about $200 billion by avoiding costly new infrastructure and lengthy new buildouts, and adding reliable resources to the grid. We need this solution to stay competitive in a changing global economy and keep the lights on for Americans at a fair cost. About 800 GW of clean energy projects currently warming the bench could be plugged right into the interconnection infrastructure at over 1,000 existing thermal plants across the country, adding much-needed capacity to the grid. This is followed by an additional 200 GW by 2030, according to new research from GridLab and the University of California Berkeley. 1,000 GW is roughly equivalent to the installed generating capacity in the United States today. By leveraging existing interconnection sites to plug in low-cost clean energy sources, energy planners can increase grid reliability, lower costs by utilizing existing grid infrastructure, and keep financial benefits in regions that have helped power America for decades. A cooperative transition between thermal and clean sources enables grid operators to master operating clean energy on their grids while keeping thermal assets available for extreme conditions until their retirement. Aging coal plants are prime candidates for surplus interconnection service. A recent analysis from the NY Times found that about a third of coal units with planned retirement dates have been extended. Nevermind air pollution, running these plants almost never makes economic sense. Over 70% of existing coal plants are more expensive to operate than the cost of building replacements using clean energy — and this is without factoring in a dime of federal incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act. And that uneconomic operation largely falls on the ratepayer. Take the federal government out of it and the case for coal still doesn’t add up. A better deal for customers is to maximize the output at aging plants so that ratepayers aren’t footing the bill for costly infrastructure that sits idle most of the time. And the business case makes sense for owners and utilities as well. By using their surplus interconnection to install a new project, power plant owners can use their existing infrastructure and install clean energy, similar to a mall renting out its under-used space. Fossil asset owners can use this surplus interconnection to pivot from an expensive fossil fuel power business to renewables. From a reliability standpoint, surplus interconnection is a near-term solution to add critical resources to the grid at a time when everyone in the energy space is asking how the country is going to meet load growth from data centers and manufacturing. Take an existing gas plant, for example, which typically underperforms in the winter when the grid is stressed. A solar plant, for example, can still produce electricity. Thermal plants around the country are operating at less than 20% capacity, yet their interconnection infrastructure is perfectly usable. By plugging in clean energy projects at the sites of aging and underused gas and coal plants, low-cost sources can be the primary generation while thermal generation pitches in only when needed. Regional transmission organizations and utilities have started to acknowledge this near-term solution to meeting rising demand — MISO has about 4,000 MW of capacity in its interconnection queue and the Southwest Power Pool has expanded its surplus interconnection service. Xcel Energy and PacifiCorp, both in the Western Interconnection, have recently used the tactic to deploy solar and storage. And the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission this month approved a PJM Interconnection proposal to update its surplus rules. The proposal was backed by utilities, clean energy advocates, environmental groups and independent power producers. Despite this encouraging progress, the U.S. is still far from fully maximizing the technical potential from robust surplus interconnection deployment. Clean electricity is currently stuck in queues looking for new interconnection while utilities are sending away tech companies seeking to power new data centers. Surplus interconnection is a win-win that speaks to the real challenge power plants, utilities and state decisionmakers face with load growth. About 1,000 GW of low-cost clean energy could be added to the grid by 2030, enough to meet rising demand quickly and affordably. Energy leaders in every state should embrace this bipartisan solution that allows access to secure clean power cheaper, faster in an age of rising demand.
powerplant
Feb 21, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Leveraging Surplus Interconnection Could Unleash 800 Gw Of Energy The Us Needs Today
Cassady Craighill is the technical education director at GridLab. The challenges facing the grid can often feel intimidating and beyond grasp. How much of the load growth is hype and how much is real? How do we ensure the financial burden of updating our grid and leading the world in energy innovation does not disproportionally fall on residential customers? How do operators and utilities prepare for the next cataclysmic flood, fire, or storm? How do we ensure that our 21st energy grid serves everyone across the country amidst a patchwork of different state policies and resources? Those are all big questions that will take years to get exactly right. Luckily, there is an out-of-the-box solution laying on the table today that will get hundreds of energy projects online in no time and will save consumers money. Surplus interconnection, which allows new energy projects to plug into existing interconnection infrastructure at plants with low capacity factors, could nearly double the generation in the United States by 2030 and at a fraction of the cost and time of a traditional interconnection process. Affordable, clean, and abundant power is key to keeping businesses operating in the U.S. This sentiment dominates the rhetoric in Energy Secretary Chris Wright’s first Secretarial order issued this month and his message of “energy addition.” At its core, surplus interconnection is adding energy resources to the grid as quickly and cheaply as possible. In his order, Secretary Wright insists “we must expand energy production and reduce energy costs for American families and businesses.” Leveraging existing interconnection capacity at thermal plants is the fastest way to expand energy production by shaving years off the interconnection timeline, saving about $200 billion by avoiding costly new infrastructure and lengthy new buildouts, and adding reliable resources to the grid. We need this solution to stay competitive in a changing global economy and keep the lights on for Americans at a fair cost. About 800 GW of clean energy projects currently warming the bench could be plugged right into the interconnection infrastructure at over 1,000 existing thermal plants across the country, adding much-needed capacity to the grid. This is followed by an additional 200 GW by 2030, according to new research from GridLab and the University of California Berkeley. 1,000 GW is roughly equivalent to the installed generating capacity in the United States today. By leveraging existing interconnection sites to plug in low-cost clean energy sources, energy planners can increase grid reliability, lower costs by utilizing existing grid infrastructure, and keep financial benefits in regions that have helped power America for decades. A cooperative transition between thermal and clean sources enables grid operators to master operating clean energy on their grids while keeping thermal assets available for extreme conditions until their retirement. Aging coal plants are prime candidates for surplus interconnection service. A recent analysis from the NY Times found that about a third of coal units with planned retirement dates have been extended. Nevermind air pollution, running these plants almost never makes economic sense. Over 70% of existing coal plants are more expensive to operate than the cost of building replacements using clean energy — and this is without factoring in a dime of federal incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act. And that uneconomic operation largely falls on the ratepayer. Take the federal government out of it and the case for coal still doesn’t add up. A better deal for customers is to maximize the output at aging plants so that ratepayers aren’t footing the bill for costly infrastructure that sits idle most of the time. And the business case makes sense for owners and utilities as well. By using their surplus interconnection to install a new project, power plant owners can use their existing infrastructure and install clean energy, similar to a mall renting out its under-used space. Fossil asset owners can use this surplus interconnection to pivot from an expensive fossil fuel power business to renewables. From a reliability standpoint, surplus interconnection is a near-term solution to add critical resources to the grid at a time when everyone in the energy space is asking how the country is going to meet load growth from data centers and manufacturing. Take an existing gas plant, for example, which typically underperforms in the winter when the grid is stressed. A solar plant, for example, can still produce electricity. Thermal plants around the country are operating at less than 20% capacity, yet their interconnection infrastructure is perfectly usable. By plugging in clean energy projects at the sites of aging and underused gas and coal plants, low-cost sources can be the primary generation while thermal generation pitches in only when needed. Regional transmission organizations and utilities have started to acknowledge this near-term solution to meeting rising demand — MISO has about 4,000 MW of capacity in its interconnection queue and the Southwest Power Pool has expanded its surplus interconnection service. Xcel Energy and PacifiCorp, both in the Western Interconnection, have recently used the tactic to deploy solar and storage. And the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission this month approved a PJM Interconnection proposal to update its surplus rules. The proposal was backed by utilities, clean energy advocates, environmental groups and independent power producers. Despite this encouraging progress, the U.S. is still far from fully maximizing the technical potential from robust surplus interconnection deployment. Clean electricity is currently stuck in queues looking for new interconnection while utilities are sending away tech companies seeking to power new data centers. Surplus interconnection is a win-win that speaks to the real challenge power plants, utilities and state decisionmakers face with load growth. About 1,000 GW of low-cost clean energy could be added to the grid by 2030, enough to meet rising demand quickly and affordably. Energy leaders in every state should embrace this bipartisan solution that allows access to secure clean power cheaper, faster in an age of rising demand.
powerplant
Feb 21, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Biogas Project Investment Increased 40% In 2024, Industry Group Says
Those trends reflect growing interest in using biogas for energy or to convert into renewable natural gas, a fuel that can be used in place of petroleum-based natural gas. The use of biogas for energy has a long history, particularly for wastewater treatment facilities and landfills. The first modern anaerobic digestion plant was built at a sewage treatment site in India in the 1800s, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Biogas capture and use has also become common for U.S. landfills above a certain size due to federal programs like the U.S. EPA’s Landfill Methane Outreach Program, which began in the 1990s. Today, 47% of all biogas capture facilities in the country are at wastewater facilities. An additional 25% are at agricultural facilities, 23% are at landfills and 5% are built to process food waste alone. Codigestion, where multiple feedstocks like food waste, agricultural waste or sewage are processed at the same time, has also become more common. A growing number of public incentives have made refining biogas a more profitable enterprise as demand increases for fuel not derived from petroleum. Policies like the federal Renewable Fuel Standard and state clean fuel initiatives have led to major growth in the biogas industry, specifically for RNG. While 77% of biogas facilities today produce power, 95% of new projects last year produced RNG instead to take advantage of those incentives, per ABC. NREL has previously estimated that RNG could displace about 5% of electric power sector natural gas consumption and 56% of transportation-related natural gas consumption. "The biogas industry is changing very quickly," Patrick Serfass, executive director of ABC, said in a recent webinar discussing the data. The landfill sector of the industry saw the least growth year over year, with 24 facilities coming online in 2024 compared to 26 in 2023. Large waste companies previously have complained about construction and permitting delays that slowed project starts, though they remain committed to building dozens of landfill-gas-to-RNG facilities across the country. Even so, landfills account for 72% of total U.S. biogas production capacity due to the high volume of gas they produce. Agriculture-based digesters grew 24% year-over-year in 2024, the most of any sector in the industry. There are currently 615 such digesters nationwide, with more on the way thanks to continued investment in the space. Standalone facilities that handle food waste remain the smallest sector in the biogas industry, with 114 operations representing 5% of all biogas facilities. Of those, 52 handled postconsumer food waste while the rest handled pre-consumer industrial food waste. Still, the sector has plenty of room for growth. "A lot of people in our industry are pretty bullish that the food waste systems will see much more significant growth in the coming years," Serfass said. ABC projects that more than 15,000 new sites could be developed for biogas use in the U.S., based on capturable gas generation across industry sectors. It notes Germany has nearly 10,000 digesters nationwide, allowing some communities to almost entirely stop using petroleum-based fuels as a result. ABC advocates for policies that would support additional industry growth, including "tailpipe rules" for medium- and heavy-duty fleets that don't favor electric vehicles over natural gas-fueled vehicles. The group is also pushing to preserve and extend tax credits that support fuel and electricity production, which may be threatened by President Trump’s targeting of Inflation Reduction Act measures. "Organic waste is everywhere; this is not an urban/rural or red/blue issue," Heather Dziedzic, vice president of policy at ABC, said last week. "This is nationwide."
powerplant
Feb 18, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
New Jersey Residential Customers Face 20% Bill Hikes, Driven By Pjm Capacity Prices: Bpu
New Jersey’s residential customers face electricity bill hikes of up to 20% beginning in June based on the results of a just-held electricity supply auction, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities said Wednesday. The results of the “Basic Generation Service” annual auction are mainly driven by the PJM Interconnection’s most recent capacity auction, according to Christine Guhl-Sadovy, BPU president. Increasing electricity demand and a lack of new power supplies due to lagging generation interconnection are also factors in the auction’s results, she said in a press release. The Basic Generation Service auction helps set the cost of electricity for most New Jersey residents and many businesses for a 12-month period starting June 1, the BPU said. PJM’s capacity auction in July cleared at record-setting prices, according to Brian Lipman, director for the Division of Rate Counsel, which represents utility ratepayers. “While some of that is due to an anticipated increase in the demand for electricity, most of the increase is due to PJM’s failure to fix its market rules or timely interconnect new generation supply,” Lipman said in the press release. “The Board’s authority is limited at the federal and regional level, but must carefully examine every state-level filing before it with an eye towards affordability.” PJM’s last capacity auction sparked complaints at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by ratepayer advocates and others as well as proposals by PJM to change its capacity auction rules and to bring more power supplies online. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy joined other governors in pressing PJM for rule changes that would protect ratepayers from rising costs in upcoming capacity auctions. PJM’s capacity prices reflect the fact that power supply is decreasing and demand is increasing, according to Jeffrey Shields, a spokesman for the grid operator. State decarbonization policies have driven resources off of the system while demand is increasing dramatically due to data center proliferation and the onshoring of the manufacturing industry, he said in an email. However, the capacity price is just one component of overall pricing, Shields said. “Retail regulation and default procurement design and hedging certainly play a role in pricing,” he said. “Not all of PJM’s footprint is experiencing the price increases that New Jersey consumers have been experiencing in recent years.” The BPU estimates that monthly electric bills for Public Service Electric and Gas residential customers will increase by 17.2% on average as a result of the agency’s electricity supply auction. The agency expects Jersey Central Power & Light residential customers will see a 20.2% increase, Atlantic City Electric residential customers will see a 17.2% hike and Rockland Electric residential customers will have an 18.2% bill increase, on average. The New Jersey auction results could be a sign of things to come for ratepayers in other PJM states, according to Paul Patterson, a Glenrock Associates equity analyst. The BPU said the winning bidders for the residential and small commercial pricing auction are: Axpo U.S.; Boston Energy Trading and Marketing; BP Energy; ConocoPhillips; Constellation Energy Generation; DTE Energy Trading; Engelhart CTP (US); Five Elements Energy II; Hartree Partners; Macquarie Energy; and, NextEra Energy Marketing. Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include PJM’s comments.
powerplant
Feb 13, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
New Jersey Residential Customers Face 20% Bill Hikes, Driven By Pjm Capacity Prices: Bpu
New Jersey’s residential customers face electricity bill hikes of up to 20% beginning in June based on the results of a just-held electricity supply auction, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities said Wednesday. The results of the “Basic Generation Service” annual auction are mainly driven by the PJM Interconnection’s most recent capacity auction, according to Christine Guhl-Sadovy, BPU president. Increasing electricity demand and a lack of new power supplies due to lagging generation interconnection are also factors in the auction’s results, she said in a press release. The Basic Generation Service auction helps set the cost of electricity for most New Jersey residents and many businesses for a 12-month period starting June 1, the BPU said. PJM’s capacity auction in July cleared at record-setting prices, according to Brian Lipman, director for the Division of Rate Counsel, which represents utility ratepayers. “While some of that is due to an anticipated increase in the demand for electricity, most of the increase is due to PJM’s failure to fix its market rules or timely interconnect new generation supply,” Lipman said in the press release. “The Board’s authority is limited at the federal and regional level, but must carefully examine every state-level filing before it with an eye towards affordability.” PJM’s last capacity auction sparked complaints at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission by ratepayer advocates and others as well as proposals by PJM to change its capacity auction rules and to bring more power supplies online. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy joined other governors in pressing PJM for rule changes that would protect ratepayers from rising costs in upcoming capacity auctions. PJM’s capacity prices reflect the fact that power supply is decreasing and demand is increasing, according to Jeffrey Shields, a spokesman for the grid operator. State decarbonization policies have driven resources off of the system while demand is increasing dramatically due to data center proliferation and the onshoring of the manufacturing industry, he said in an email. However, the capacity price is just one component of overall pricing, Shields said. “Retail regulation and default procurement design and hedging certainly play a role in pricing,” he said. “Not all of PJM’s footprint is experiencing the price increases that New Jersey consumers have been experiencing in recent years.” The BPU estimates that monthly electric bills for Public Service Electric and Gas residential customers will increase by 17.2% on average as a result of the agency’s electricity supply auction. The agency expects Jersey Central Power & Light residential customers will see a 20.2% increase, Atlantic City Electric residential customers will see a 17.2% hike and Rockland Electric residential customers will have an 18.2% bill increase, on average. The New Jersey auction results could be a sign of things to come for ratepayers in other PJM states, according to Paul Patterson, a Glenrock Associates equity analyst. The BPU said the winning bidders for the residential and small commercial pricing auction are: Axpo U.S.; Boston Energy Trading and Marketing; BP Energy; ConocoPhillips; Constellation Energy Generation; DTE Energy Trading; Engelhart CTP (US); Five Elements Energy II; Hartree Partners; Macquarie Energy; and, NextEra Energy Marketing. Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include PJM’s comments.
powerplant
Feb 13, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Ferc Approves Pjm’S Fast-Track Power Plant Interconnection Plan
Dismissing opposition from renewable energy developers, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Tuesday approved the PJM Interconnection’s proposal for a fast-track interconnection review for shovel-ready generation projects. The agency also approved PJM’s proposal to expand access to the grid through underused interconnection capacity by revising its Surplus Interconnection Service rules. Both proposals are part of a broad effort by PJM to increase power supplies in its footprint ahead of potential capacity shortfalls it says could begin as soon as 2026. FERC said PJM’s Reliability Resource Initiative, which provides a one-time interconnection review for up to 50 generating projects, “reasonably addresses” possible resource adequacy shortfalls driven by significant load growth, premature power plant retirements and delays in bringing new generating resources online. PJM estimates its initiative could bring about 10 GW online 18 months earlier than if the projects followed the grid operator’s normal interconnection process, according to FERC’s decision. “The Commission must confront the real and consequential harm that failing to act could have on consumers in the PJM region,” FERC commissioners Willie Phillips and David Rosner said in a concurrence to the 3-1 decision. Phillips and Rosner said they voted for PJM’s "extraordinary" proposal despite concerns that it may not bring new power supplies online in time to meet potential capacity shortfalls. FERC Commissioner Judy Chang dissented from the decision, saying the initiative expedites projects that are unlikely to address PJM’s potential shortfalls before 2030. “By facilitating queue jumping for large generators, which are the most challenging to develop, acquire the necessary environmental permits, and obtain adequate material supplies and labor for construction and focusing primarily on large generators over speed of development, PJM’s proposal may not actually resolve its impending capacity shortage,” Chang said. FERC Commissioner Lindsay See didn’t participate in the decision. Under the initiative, PJM will let 50 projects that meet scoring criteria for reliability, viability and availability enter an interconnection review process — Transition Cycle #2 — that started early this year. FERC said those criteria weren’t unduly discriminatory. “The criteria are facially neutral and allow for potential inclusion of any resource regardless of technology,” the agency said. FERC also rejected arguments by Invenergy and others that PJM’s proposal violated the filed rate doctrine and the related rule against retroactive ratemaking. “It is unclear how interconnection customers can have settled expectations with regard to Transition Cycle #2 given that the composition and other aspects of the cluster have not been settled,” FERC said. PJM’s decision to limit its initiative to 50 projects “strikes a reasonable balance between allowing [Reliability Resource Initiative] project developers to help address the resource adequacy needs of the PJM region, while avoiding an influx of projects that could overwhelm Transition Cycle #2 and lead to further delays, exacerbating the current inability of projects to come online in the near term,” FERC said. State utility regulators, PJM’s market monitor, the PJM Power Providers Group and electric utilities were among the supporters of PJM’s proposed Reliability Resource Initiative. Renewable energy developers, including Invenergy, and advocacy groups such as the Sierra Club opposed the grid operator’s plan. FERC also approved changes to PJM’s rules for Surplus Interconnection Service, or SIS, that could help get additional capacity online. SIS allows a new resource to use any unused portion of an existing generating facility’s interconnection service as long as the total amount of interconnection service at the point of interconnection remains the same. Battery storage, for example, could be paired with intermittent resources to more fully use available interconnection capacity. PJM’s proposal removes most of the limitations it placed on SIS and allows requests for the service to be submitted earlier in the project development cycle. The SIS process runs separately from the interconnection queue process and takes less than half the time to complete. The approved changes could unlock more than 26 GW of accredited capacity for the 2026/2027 delivery year, American Clean Power Association, Advanced Energy United, MAREC Action and the Solar Energy Industries Association said in comments supporting the proposal.
powerplant
Feb 12, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Ferc Approves Pjm’S Fast-Track Power Plant Interconnection Plan
Dismissing opposition from renewable energy developers, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Tuesday approved the PJM Interconnection’s proposal for a fast-track interconnection review for shovel-ready generation projects. The agency also approved PJM’s proposal to expand access to the grid through underused interconnection capacity by revising its Surplus Interconnection Service rules. Both proposals are part of a broad effort by PJM to increase power supplies in its footprint ahead of potential capacity shortfalls it says could begin as soon as 2026. FERC said PJM’s Reliability Resource Initiative, which provides a one-time interconnection review for up to 50 generating projects, “reasonably addresses” possible resource adequacy shortfalls driven by significant load growth, premature power plant retirements and delays in bringing new generating resources online. PJM estimates its initiative could bring about 10 GW online 18 months earlier than if the projects followed the grid operator’s normal interconnection process, according to FERC’s decision. “The Commission must confront the real and consequential harm that failing to act could have on consumers in the PJM region,” FERC commissioners Willie Phillips and David Rosner said in a concurrence to the 3-1 decision. Phillips and Rosner said they voted for PJM’s "extraordinary" proposal despite concerns that it may not bring new power supplies online in time to meet potential capacity shortfalls. FERC Commissioner Judy Chang dissented from the decision, saying the initiative expedites projects that are unlikely to address PJM’s potential shortfalls before 2030. “By facilitating queue jumping for large generators, which are the most challenging to develop, acquire the necessary environmental permits, and obtain adequate material supplies and labor for construction and focusing primarily on large generators over speed of development, PJM’s proposal may not actually resolve its impending capacity shortage,” Chang said. FERC Commissioner Lindsay See didn’t participate in the decision. Under the initiative, PJM will let 50 projects that meet scoring criteria for reliability, viability and availability enter an interconnection review process — Transition Cycle #2 — that started early this year. FERC said those criteria weren’t unduly discriminatory. “The criteria are facially neutral and allow for potential inclusion of any resource regardless of technology,” the agency said. FERC also rejected arguments by Invenergy and others that PJM’s proposal violated the filed rate doctrine and the related rule against retroactive ratemaking. “It is unclear how interconnection customers can have settled expectations with regard to Transition Cycle #2 given that the composition and other aspects of the cluster have not been settled,” FERC said. PJM’s decision to limit its initiative to 50 projects “strikes a reasonable balance between allowing [Reliability Resource Initiative] project developers to help address the resource adequacy needs of the PJM region, while avoiding an influx of projects that could overwhelm Transition Cycle #2 and lead to further delays, exacerbating the current inability of projects to come online in the near term,” FERC said. State utility regulators, PJM’s market monitor, the PJM Power Providers Group and electric utilities were among the supporters of PJM’s proposed Reliability Resource Initiative. Renewable energy developers, including Invenergy, and advocacy groups such as the Sierra Club opposed the grid operator’s plan. FERC also approved changes to PJM’s rules for Surplus Interconnection Service, or SIS, that could help get additional capacity online. SIS allows a new resource to use any unused portion of an existing generating facility’s interconnection service as long as the total amount of interconnection service at the point of interconnection remains the same. Battery storage, for example, could be paired with intermittent resources to more fully use available interconnection capacity. PJM’s proposal removes most of the limitations it placed on SIS and allows requests for the service to be submitted earlier in the project development cycle. The SIS process runs separately from the interconnection queue process and takes less than half the time to complete. The approved changes could unlock more than 26 GW of accredited capacity for the 2026/2027 delivery year, American Clean Power Association, Advanced Energy United, MAREC Action and the Solar Energy Industries Association said in comments supporting the proposal.
powerplant
Feb 12, 2025
UTILITY DIVE GENERATION
Alabama Power’S $622M Deal To Buy Tenaska Power Plant Faces Challenge At Ferc
FERC on Monday proposed allowing communications between agency staff and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division so they could discuss Alabama Power’s plan to buy the Lindsay Hill power plant near Billingsley, Alabama, from two Tenaska subsidiaries. Output from the power plant is under contract to Mercuria Energy America via a power purchase agreement that expires April 30, 2027. Alabama Power said it intends to honor the contract. Alabama Power expects to close on the deal before October, Southern Co. said in an Oct. 31 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Alabama Public Service Commission is reviewing the proposed deal, which Alabama Power said it expects will raise typical residential electricity bills by $3.80 a month. Energy Alabama, GASP and Public Citizen contend that this planned acquisition comes as Alabama Power has been consolidating control over generation in the state. If the Lindsay Hill purchase is completed, Alabama Power would have bought and built power plants, or entered into PPAs, totaling about 3,400 MW in the last five years, according to the groups. The utility currently controls nearly 12,950 MW, they said. “Alabama Power’s systematic acquisition of large generating facilities — and by extension, Southern Company’s consolidation of generating capacity in the region — is especially concerning given the size of the [Southern Co. balancing authority area,]” which includes about 61 GW, the groups said. If FERC determines that adding the Lindsay Hill power plant to Alabama Power’s generation fleet would harm competition in the Southern Co. balancing authority area, the agency should assess whether new market mitigation measures are needed to prevent Southern Co. utilities from exerting market power, according to the groups. In their Dec. 9 application at FERC, Alabama Power and Tenaska said the planned deal “will not result in any adverse effect on competition, rates, or regulation and will not result in any cross-subsidization.” Alabama Power’s planned purchase of the Lindsay Hill power plant grew out of a request for proposal process that started in 2023, the utility said when requesting approval for the deal from the Alabama PSC. The RFP was driven by Alabama Power’s most recent integrated resource plan, which showed the utility faces a nearly 1,180-MW shortfall in the resources it needs to meet a 25% reserve margin in 2029, according to the filing with the PSC. In response to the solicitation, Alabama Power received nine proposals from four bidders, the utility said. Ultimately, the utility considered two offers, both from Tenaska: buy Lindsay Hill or enter into a PPA for its output. The utility said buying the power plant was the less expensive option. The Lindsay Hill power plant started operating in 2002. The plant’s output has been under contract to Mercuria, an energy marketer and trader, since then. It is next to Alabama Power’s Central Alabama generating station, which the utility bought from Tenaska in 2020. Alabama Power expects it will be able to save money by owning adjacent power plants. Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include FERC’s proposal to allow talks between its staff and DOJ.
powerplant
Feb 10, 2025